News

18th September, 2020

Claimant admits under cross examination lying to his medico-legal expert.

In Azad v Aviva, heard at Burnley County Court on 14th September 2020, the Claimant Mr. Azad brought a claim for personal injury, recovery/storage and credit hire. The total value of the claim was just over £20,000. While liability wasn`t admitted that fact that this was a rear end collision caused the Defendants some difficulty.

David Calvert was instructed by Aviva to defend the claim – he did so without any witnesses to support the defence.

After an hour or so of intensive cross examination by David the Claimant admitted in open court to the judge that he had lied to his expert about time off work taken as a result of his injury.

As practionners will know while its not unusual for witnesses to be found by a judge to be lying, it is unusual for a witness to admit to a judge they were lying.

Unsurprisingly the Judge engaged the provisions of s57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 with the result that the entire claim (not just for personal injury which the dishonestly related to) was dismissed.

After carrying out the valuation exercise in relation to the remaining heads of damage not infected by dishonestly and discounting the same from the Defendants costs, the Claimant incurred a costs liability of nearly £2000. But more importantly what seemed like a straightforward claim on liability and quantum was unsuccessful. No doubt the Claimant will also need to account to the car hire company…

David Calvert regularly undertakes work for all major insurers and is known to be a tenacious and successful cross examiner.



Latest News...

Nicholas Clarke QC led Howard Bernstein in defending a man charged with murdering his 2 month old baby

14th October, 2020
Numerous experts (Paediatric Pathologists, Neuroradiologists, Histopathologists, Neuropathologists, Ophthalmologists etc) on both sides dealt with the cause of death.

Success for David Calvert for TUI as the Claimants evidence attacked post Griffiths V TUI

13th October, 2020
While we wait to see if TUI will be granted permission to appeal the case of Griffiths, the world still keeps on turning and claims are being dismissed even where the medical evidence has not been controverted in the "Griffiths sense".