28th May, 2014

Members of Travel Law Team attend PEOPIL Conferences

During May, Boyd Morwood and Ian Denham attended the PEOPIL (Pan-European Association of Personal Injury Lawyers) RTA and Whiplash Conference in Amsterdam. 

Topics discussed at the Conference included a comparison of liability issues of cycling claims arising in England and Wales, the Netherlands and France as well as recent developments in Rome II. The Conference was attended by over 40 delegates from across Europe. 

At the Conference Ian Denham was elected to act as the Secretary to the PEOPIL RTA & Whiplash European Exchange Group.

PEOPIL’s Dutch hosts also provided a series of cultural events including a guided tour of the Rijksmuseum, tasting of Dutch cuisine and a canal boat tour of Amsterdam.

Previously, in April of this year, Ian Denham, William Hamilton, Jasmine Skander and Amy Rollings attended the inaugural PEOPIL Young Lawyers’ Conference which was held at the offices of Irwin Mitchell in London.

Boyd Morwood, Ian Denham, William Hamiliton and Jasmine Skander are all members of Chambers’ Travel Law team.



Latest News...

Further Ranking Success for 9 St John Street in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2025

18th October, 2024
9 St John Street Chambers are delighted to announce we have received further recognition in the Chambers UK Bar Guide 2025. Our Employment, Personal Injury, Crime, Family, Real Estate Litigation, and Chancery teams have been acknowledged as leading sets within the Northern Circuit.

Chambers UK Bar 2025 Listings for 9 St John Street

18th October, 2024
Following the release of the 2025 edition of Chambers UK Bar, with an outstanding amount of 29 individual rankings, our barristers continue to be recognised as leaders in their field across a wide range of practice areas.

James Hurd secures strike out of unfair dismissal claim on the basis of doctrine of frustration.

7th October, 2024
I recently acted for the Respondent in the case of Rayner v MOD in the Bristol Employment Tribunal (03 October 2024). The case was unusual for two reasons. Firstly, the Claimant lacked capacity and a Litigation Friend was appointed in accordance with the guidance in Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Limited (Practice & Procedure) (2017) UKEAT 0062/17.