26th March, 2024

Success in the Court of Appeal for Beth Caunce – R v Mbatijua Murise

Beth Caunce appeared in the Court of Appeal and successfully appealed against sentence.

Mr Murise was sentenced in November 2023 to a term of 2 years’ imprisonment. He had earlier entered guilty pleas at first opportunity to two counts of possession with intent to supply Class A drugs (heroin and crack cocaine). The starting point after trial taken at first instance was 3 years.

Beth secured permission to appeal and at the hearing in February 2024 saw the sentence quashed and replaced with a term of 20 months’ imprisonment. The Court determined that the starting point of 3 years after trial was wrong in principle and ought to have been reduced to account for the mitigating features. The Court further noted that, whilst the Judge had been appropriately persuaded into the Lesser Role category at first instance, this was correct not for the reasons that the Judge gave, that Mr Murise was 20 and made early admissions, but because of Mr Murise’s limited role, limited financial gain and naivety.



Latest News...

Further Ranking Success for 9 St John Street in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2025

18th October, 2024
9 St John Street Chambers are delighted to announce we have received further recognition in the Chambers UK Bar Guide 2025. Our Employment, Personal Injury, Crime, Family, Real Estate Litigation, and Chancery teams have been acknowledged as leading sets within the Northern Circuit.

Chambers UK Bar 2025 Listings for 9 St John Street

18th October, 2024
Following the release of the 2025 edition of Chambers UK Bar, with an outstanding amount of 29 individual rankings, our barristers continue to be recognised as leaders in their field across a wide range of practice areas.

James Hurd secures strike out of unfair dismissal claim on the basis of doctrine of frustration.

7th October, 2024
I recently acted for the Respondent in the case of Rayner v MOD in the Bristol Employment Tribunal (03 October 2024). The case was unusual for two reasons. Firstly, the Claimant lacked capacity and a Litigation Friend was appointed in accordance with the guidance in Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Limited (Practice & Procedure) (2017) UKEAT 0062/17.