31st March, 2023

Victoria Rigby: No one size fits all in equine

Recent horse cases reaffirm that there is no 'one size fits all' approach in equine cases.
The case-by-case approach is very much still in play.

The takeaway from the judgment of Lady Justice Carr in the case of Ford v Seymour Williams [2021] EWCA Civ 1848 demonstrates that it is not enough that Claimants can prove under s2(2)(c) that the Defendant had knowledge that his horse could rear. The Claimant must also prove that the Defendant knew that his horse could do this in the ‘particular times and circumstances’ which materialised in the case under s2(2)(b). Those times and circumstances must be capable of identification.

The interplay between the three sections is crucial here, as is the need to comply with each section.

Similarly, in the case of Schoultz v Ball [2022] EWHC 2452 KB the facts initially seemed remarkably similar to those in the case of Mirvahedy wherein a horse escaped from its field and collided with a car on a highway causing severe injury to the occupant. In Mirvahedy, the Claimant succeeded under Section 2(2)(b).

The distinguishing feature here was that rather than escaping from the field in a blind panic and charging down the highway at speed, this horse was neither frightened nor panicked and had been seen walking along the motorway. The behaviour was not sufficient to satisfy s2(2)(b) in that the likelihood of damage was not due to characteristics of the horse which were not normally found in horses except a particular times or in particular circumstances. Rather it was due to the horse being a large and heavy animal which was standing on a dual carriage way where it should not have been standing. This case reiterates that nothing is predictable when it comes to establishing liability under the Act.

As an aside it was found that fence posts were inadequately installed in that they had only been sunk to a depth of 6-8” as opposed to the 16-18” claimed.

Victoria Rigby is a specialist in personal injuries caused by animals including horses, especially those involving very serious personal injuries or technical legal arguments around the Animals Act 1971, see below to view Victoria’s profile.


Victoria Rigby

Click here to view Victoria Rigby's profile.



Latest News...

Further Ranking Success for 9 St John Street in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2025

18th October, 2024
9 St John Street Chambers are delighted to announce we have received further recognition in the Chambers UK Bar Guide 2025. Our Employment, Personal Injury, Crime, Family, Real Estate Litigation, and Chancery teams have been acknowledged as leading sets within the Northern Circuit.

Chambers UK Bar 2025 Listings for 9 St John Street

18th October, 2024
Following the release of the 2025 edition of Chambers UK Bar, with an outstanding amount of 29 individual rankings, our barristers continue to be recognised as leaders in their field across a wide range of practice areas.

James Hurd secures strike out of unfair dismissal claim on the basis of doctrine of frustration.

7th October, 2024
I recently acted for the Respondent in the case of Rayner v MOD in the Bristol Employment Tribunal (03 October 2024). The case was unusual for two reasons. Firstly, the Claimant lacked capacity and a Litigation Friend was appointed in accordance with the guidance in Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Limited (Practice & Procedure) (2017) UKEAT 0062/17.