6th April, 2020

Virtual Fast Track Personal Injury Trial

COVID-19 isolation measures, implemented by the Government two weeks ago, have resulted in the adjournment of many civil trials which historically would have only been dealt with in person.

It is anticipated that the current COVID-19 measures will continue for the foreseeable future and accordingly there will be listing difficulties for such cases coming to trial.

It is therefore in the interests of litigants, the court service and the legal profession that where trials can fairly be conducted remotely, and the parties are in agreement that this should be the case, this is the preferred course of action.

This is recognised in the most recent court updates, such as that from HHJ Bird, DCJ for Greater Manchester, on 31st March, and HHJ Wood QC, DCJ for Cheshire and Merseyside, on 2nd April.

Members of the 9 St John Street Personal Injury Group have produced a short film demonstrating the use of remote technology to undertake a mock fast track road traffic liability trial.

The film has been produced using Zoom but the same exercise was also conducted using Microsoft Teams, which was considered to be just as effective. Both facilitate the screen sharing of documents, such as the trial bundle, and enable the parties to assist the Court with online tools such as Google Earth. 9 St John Street’s barristers all have access to both platforms and are able to participate in trials using either.

This mock trial is short as it is intended to be illustrative only, but the participants consider that longer hearings could be conducted in the same way.

Chambers thanks members of the 9SJS PI Team, Jamie Hill, Elizabeth Murray, Kirsty McKinlay, Michael O’Neil and Christopher Taft for producing the film.

Chambers is happy to share what it has learnt from this exercise with solicitors or insurers who may be interested in having their cases dealt with remotely. All enquiries should be made to Joe Gibson on 0161 955 5161 or Joe.Gibson@9sjs.com.



Latest News...

Employment status in the EAT: One man-two guvnors? Is a taxi-driver ever self-employed?

30th March, 2023
Louise acted pro bono via Advocate for a taxi owner who had been found to be the employer of the driver who rented his taxi in the EAT before HHJ Auerbach.

Inheritance Act Claims Webinar - Broken promises and testamentary freedom

30th March, 2023
David Gilchrist, Richard Selwyn Sharpe and Charles Holbech will discuss topical issues under the Inheritance Act and in relation to claims of proprietary estoppel which affect wills, estates and the administration of estates.

Martin Mensah and Amy Smith participate in Mock Employment Tribunal for Squire Patton Boggs

22nd March, 2023
They were able to bring their specialist experience to the training session, helping managers and Employee Relations identify best practice when dealing with disciplinary hearings.