27th March, 2019

William Hamilton secures finding of fundamental dishonesty

Will acted for the Defendant Insurer in the matter of L v Advantage Insurance Company Limited. He was instructed by Horwich Farrelly Solicitors.

L brought a PI claim following a road traffic accident. The Defendant alleged that the Claimant had not been injured on the grounds of low velocity impact. The Defendant also challenged the Claimant’s vehicle damage claim on the basis that the damage had not been caused in the accident. Both parties adduced expert engineering evidence which supported their respective positions in relation to vehicle damage. The Claimant made a number of fundamental changes to his witness evidence in examination in chief, and for the first time contended that the collision took place in a completely different location to that alleged by the Defendant.

During Will's cross-examination, the Claimant accepted that he had been reckless in signing the statement of truth in his witness statement. The Judge stated he was extremely concerned by this and indicated it may give rise to contempt of court. Ultimately, in view of the inconsistencies and discrepancies in the Claimant's evidence, the Judge was unable to accept that the Claimant had been injured in the accident or that the damage to his vehicle had been caused by the accident. The Judge found the claim to be "opportunistic from the start" and fundamentally dishonest.

Will obtained an enforceable costs order for the Defendant along with the repayment of a without prejudice interim payment that had been made in respect of the vehicle damage.

Will's chambers profile can be viewed HERE.



Latest News...

Further Ranking Success for 9 St John Street in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2025

18th October, 2024
9 St John Street Chambers are delighted to announce we have received further recognition in the Chambers UK Bar Guide 2025. Our Employment, Personal Injury, Crime, Family, Real Estate Litigation, and Chancery teams have been acknowledged as leading sets within the Northern Circuit.

Chambers UK Bar 2025 Listings for 9 St John Street

18th October, 2024
Following the release of the 2025 edition of Chambers UK Bar, with an outstanding amount of 29 individual rankings, our barristers continue to be recognised as leaders in their field across a wide range of practice areas.

James Hurd secures strike out of unfair dismissal claim on the basis of doctrine of frustration.

7th October, 2024
I recently acted for the Respondent in the case of Rayner v MOD in the Bristol Employment Tribunal (03 October 2024). The case was unusual for two reasons. Firstly, the Claimant lacked capacity and a Litigation Friend was appointed in accordance with the guidance in Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Limited (Practice & Procedure) (2017) UKEAT 0062/17.