3rd November, 2009

Alan Curbishley v West Ham United FC PLC

The FA Premier League has today announced that the Managers’ Arbitration Tribunal set up to consider Alan Curbishley’s claim of wrongful dismissal against West Ham United Football Club has unanimously upheld that claim.

Alan Curbishley, who was represented at the hearing by Paul Gilroy QC of 9 St John Street Chambers, resigned at the beginning of the 2008/09 Season after the Club sold Anton Ferdinand and subsequently George McCartney to Sunderland against his wishes. The Tribunal, which was chaired by retired Court of Appeal Judge Sir Philip Otton, upheld Mr Curbishley’s right to have ultimate sole authority in relation to the sale and purchase of players. The Club also dismissed the Club’s Counterclaim relating to the cost of employing Gianfranco Zola and his Assistant, Steve Clarke. Compensation will now be assessed.

Commenting after the outcome was published, Alan Curbishley said “I am obviously delighted with this result. I very much enjoyed my time at West Ham and never wanted to leave, but on joining the Club I insisted that my contract contained a clause confirming that I would have final say on the selection of players to be transferred to and from the Club. The Club completely ignored my contract when selling Anton Ferdinand, and when George McCartney was then sold, the Club having given me assurances that no players would be leaving the Club after the sale of Anton Ferdinand, I had no alternative but to resign. My authority and integrity were undermined and my position was made untenable. I now wish to put this entire matter behind me”.

Paul Gilroy QC stated “the Tribunal held that the conduct of the Club amounted to a fundamental breach of contract, and concluded that Mr Curbishley was therefore entitled to resign”.

Coming hot on the heels of the similar outcome in the case pursued by Kevin Keegan under the same arbitration procedure, the Curbishley decision represents a further strengthening of the authority of the modern day football manager. Further details in relation to the case can be found on the FA Premier League website: www.premierleague.com. The full decision has yet to be published.



Latest News...

Further Ranking Success for 9 St John Street in Chambers UK Bar Directory 2025

18th October, 2024
9 St John Street Chambers are delighted to announce we have received further recognition in the Chambers UK Bar Guide 2025. Our Employment, Personal Injury, Crime, Family, Real Estate Litigation, and Chancery teams have been acknowledged as leading sets within the Northern Circuit.

Chambers UK Bar 2025 Listings for 9 St John Street

18th October, 2024
Following the release of the 2025 edition of Chambers UK Bar, with an outstanding amount of 29 individual rankings, our barristers continue to be recognised as leaders in their field across a wide range of practice areas.

James Hurd secures strike out of unfair dismissal claim on the basis of doctrine of frustration.

7th October, 2024
I recently acted for the Respondent in the case of Rayner v MOD in the Bristol Employment Tribunal (03 October 2024). The case was unusual for two reasons. Firstly, the Claimant lacked capacity and a Litigation Friend was appointed in accordance with the guidance in Jhuti v Royal Mail Group Limited (Practice & Procedure) (2017) UKEAT 0062/17.