11th February, 2019

Amy Rollings secures two findings of fundamental dishonesty in four weeks

In R, a holiday illness claim, Amy successfully argued that the Claimant was fundamentally dishonest.  The finding principally related to the Claimant dishonestly stating that she had not been on excursions, when the Judge found she had been on at least four.  In addition there were numerous Facebook entries suggesting exaggeration of symptoms. 

In P, after having numerous inconsistencies exposed during cross examination, the Claimant was found to have brought a false holiday illness claim.  Most instructive was that P had not made any contemporaneous complaint of illness despite filling out questionnaires and completing online reviews whilst allegedly suffering symptoms.

In both cases Amy secured enforceable costs orders for the Defendant.

Amy Rollings' profile and contact information can be viewed here.



Latest News...

Robert Lassey succeeds on four grounds in the EAT in a race discrimination appeal

8th June, 2023
Robert Lassey has successfully appealed against a Majority finding of the Employment Tribunal that a Claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of his race following a disciplinary process which resulted in the termination of his engagement with the Respondent.

Non-Compete Clause Rule Changes: What Employers Must Know

30th May, 2023

A non-competition restriction, a form of restrictive covenant also known as a "non-compete" clause, prevents employees...