News

11th February, 2019

Amy Rollings secures two findings of fundamental dishonesty in four weeks

In R, a holiday illness claim, Amy successfully argued that the Claimant was fundamentally dishonest.  The finding principally related to the Claimant dishonestly stating that she had not been on excursions, when the Judge found she had been on at least four.  In addition there were numerous Facebook entries suggesting exaggeration of symptoms. 

In P, after having numerous inconsistencies exposed during cross examination, the Claimant was found to have brought a false holiday illness claim.  Most instructive was that P had not made any contemporaneous complaint of illness despite filling out questionnaires and completing online reviews whilst allegedly suffering symptoms.

In both cases Amy secured enforceable costs orders for the Defendant.

Amy Rollings' profile and contact information can be viewed here.



Latest News...

Health and safety employment claims in the time of Coronavirus: Isabel Baylis explores the new line of cases

9th June, 2021
Isabel Baylis provides key insights into the new realm of health and safety cases in the employment context.

9SJS Insurance Fraud team delivers a Virtual Mock Trial to DAC Beachcrofts Birmingham Office, in relation to fraudulent EL/PL claims

8th June, 2021
9 St John Street's Insurance Fraud team have today delivered a Virtual Mock Trial to DAC Beachcrofts Birmingham Office, in relation to fraudulent EL/PL claims.

Malka Afzal to start her 2nd six months pupillage on 7th June 2021

7th June, 2021
9 St John Street Chambers are delighted to announce Malka Afzal is to start her 2nd six months pupillage on 7th June 2021