11th February, 2019

Amy Rollings secures two findings of fundamental dishonesty in four weeks

In R, a holiday illness claim, Amy successfully argued that the Claimant was fundamentally dishonest.  The finding principally related to the Claimant dishonestly stating that she had not been on excursions, when the Judge found she had been on at least four.  In addition there were numerous Facebook entries suggesting exaggeration of symptoms. 

In P, after having numerous inconsistencies exposed during cross examination, the Claimant was found to have brought a false holiday illness claim.  Most instructive was that P had not made any contemporaneous complaint of illness despite filling out questionnaires and completing online reviews whilst allegedly suffering symptoms.

In both cases Amy secured enforceable costs orders for the Defendant.

Amy Rollings' profile and contact information can be viewed here.



Latest News...

Nine St John Street Rising Stars: Robert Lassey

6th February, 2023
At Nine St John Street we pride ourselves on creating an environment that helps our Members practice thrive. All too often this happens 'behind the scenes' however from time to time the success of our Members is recognised by some of the leading Legal publications in the world. One such example is the Legal 500 'Rising Stars'...

James Abernethy appointed as Junior Counsel to the Crown

2nd February, 2023
We are delighted to announce that James Abernethy has been appointed to the Regional C Panel as Junior Counsel to the Crown.

Louise Quigley appointed as fee paid Judge of First Tier Tribunal

2nd February, 2023
We are delighted to announce that Louise Quigley has been appointed as a fee paid Judge of the First Tier Tribunal, assigned to the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber.