12th April, 2011

Daniel Northall acts for employer in leading EAT decision on issue estoppel and abuse of process

The EAT (His Honour Judge Hand QC presiding) has handed down its decision in Parker v Northumbrian Water UKEAT/0221/10/CEA.

The appeal in part concerned the circumstances in which a Claimant is prevented from bringing fresh claims in the Employment Tribunal which overlap (whether factually or legally) with earlier proceedings (to which cause of action and/or issue estoppel might apply), or which could have been brought in the earlier proceedings but were not (to which the rule in Henderson v Henderson might apply).

In an extended consideration of the rule in  Henderson v Henderson, the EAT concluded that Employment tribunals were best advised to adopt the 'broad merits-based' approach endorsed by Lord Bingham in the House of Lords decision of Johnson v Gore Wood [2002] 2 AC 1. If claims brought to the Tribunal could have been brought in earlier proceedings but were not, a Tribunal should ask itself whether in all circumstances the Claimant's conduct is an abuse. It should not assume it is an abuse and then ask whether the abuse is excused or justified by special circumstances. Insofar as the latter approach was adopted by the Court of Appeal in Divine-Borty v Brent London Borough Council [1998] ICR 886, the EAT concluded that Tribunals should no longer follow that decision.

The full text of the EAT’s judgment can be found HERE



Latest News...

The judgment of the Supreme Court in TUI v Griffiths regarding 'uncontroverted' expert evidence: nuclear bomb or damp squib?

29th November, 2023
William Hamilton and Beth Caunce review this Supreme Court decision which concerns the correct approach to "uncontroverted" expert evidence, here in the context of a travel sickness claim, but with broader ramifications regarding the procedural fairness of refraining from cross-examining an expert or relying on one’s own expert and waiting instead to criticise that expert’s opinion in closing submissions.

"Don't discuss the case with anyone until your evidence has finished" (we really mean it!)

28th November, 2023
Rachael Levene and Louise Quigley successfully got a multi-day claim of race discrimination struck out after the Claimant failed to heed the warning of not discussing the case until her evidence was complete.

Pupillage Gateway, open to view adverts

27th November, 2023
Today we launch our adverts for pupillage in the Criminal, Family, Employment and Personal Injury teams.