19th July, 2019

Jamie Hill Establishes Claims Brought By 3 Claimants Are Fundamentally Dishonesty

Jamie Hill was instructed by the Defendant Insurer in the matter of S and others v S.  All 3 Claimants alleged that they had suffered various soft tissue injuries as a result of a collision in a car park.  The said collision was captured on CCTV.  The Defendant Insurer had the footage examined by an expert who opined that the collision was at no more than 3mph and that accordingly, it was extremely unlikely that personal injury could have been occasioned.

The Judge accepted the expert evidence and found that all 3 of the Claimant’s cases were riddled with inconsistency and contradiction.  Ultimately the Judge was satisfied that all 3 Claimants were making up their evidence as they were going along and that accordingly there could be no hesitation in a finding of fundamental dishonesty.

The Defendant was awarded its costs of defending the action, which exceeded £10,500.

Jamie continues to expand his insurance fraud practice. Please see here for his updated profile and CV.



Latest News...

Nine St John Street Rising Stars: Robert Lassey

6th February, 2023
At Nine St John Street we pride ourselves on creating an environment that helps our Members practice thrive. All too often this happens 'behind the scenes' however from time to time the success of our Members is recognised by some of the leading Legal publications in the world. One such example is the Legal 500 'Rising Stars'...

James Abernethy appointed as Junior Counsel to the Crown

2nd February, 2023
We are delighted to announce that James Abernethy has been appointed to the Regional C Panel as Junior Counsel to the Crown.

Louise Quigley appointed as fee paid Judge of First Tier Tribunal

2nd February, 2023
We are delighted to announce that Louise Quigley has been appointed as a fee paid Judge of the First Tier Tribunal, assigned to the Health, Education and Social Care Chamber.