News

25th February, 2015

Lothian v Dixon and Webb. Richard Selwyn Sharpe successfully acts for Claimants awarded estate under doctrine of proprietary estoppel

Lothian v Dixon (2014) Ch D HH Judge Kaye QC

Richard Selwyn Sharpe acted for the successful claimants Mr and Mrs Lothian who were awarded the deceased's entire estate under the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. The deceased who had been diagnosed with terminal cancer asked Mrs Lothian to leave her home in Scotland and come down to her hotel in Scarborough to live with her full time , to care for her during her final illness and help manage the hotel until her death. In return she promised the Lothians her entire estate. Mrs Lothian carried out the deceased's wishes and her husband stayed in Scotland running the family home and visiting her once a month. The day before she died the deceased gave instructions to a solicitor for a will reflecting this promise but it was never executed . The first defendant , a beneficiary under the deceased's last will made many years before (under which she and Mrs Lothian received a half share in the residue), opposed the claim and argued that the relief should be limited to £40,000 plus travel expenses in addition to Mrs Lothian's share under the will. Judge Kaye QC disagreed and awarded the Lothians the deceased's entire estate after payment of legacies. Gillett v Holt, Thorner v Major, Suggitt v Suggitt applied

View the judgment here



Latest News...

Jaime Hamilton QC and Matthew Curtis prosecute four men for the murder of a teenager

17th January, 2022
Four men have been jailed for life for the murder of 17-year-old Josiah Norman, killed in a knife attack in Salford in April 2021.

We are seeking applicants for a Fees Clerk

12th January, 2022
A vacancy has arisen for a Fees Clerk to join the team on a full-time basis.

Louise Quigley appears in ET addressing whether a fear of catching COVID19 is a protected belief under the Equality Act 2010

6th January, 2022
Representing the Respondent, Louise successfully persuaded the Employment Tribunal that the Claimant's fear, albeit genuine, did not meet the criteria in Granger plc v. Nicholson [2010] IRLR 4.