News

13th January, 2015

Phil de Berry successfully appeals a case management order regarding alleged expert shopping

Following an application before a DJ, the Claimant was ordered to disclose an advisory medical report as a condition precedent to permission to rely upon a Part 35 report.  It was suggested the Claimant had engaged in expert shopping. HHJ Freedman, the DCJ of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne County Court, recognised that there is a fundamental difference between an advisory report and a Part 35 report. He rejected the allegation of expert shopping and expressed support for the contention that parties ought to be able to obtain a second opinion in private without being in fear of having to disclose that advice.

View Mr De Berry's profile HERE.



Latest News...

Jaime Hamilton QC addresses The Bulgarian Anti-Corruption Commission

15th June, 2021
On Tuesday 15th June 2021, Jaime Hamilton QC provided a presentation to the Bulgarian Anti-Corruption Commission.

Health and safety employment claims in the time of Coronavirus: Isabel Baylis explores the new line of cases

9th June, 2021
Isabel Baylis provides key insights into the new realm of health and safety cases in the employment context.

9SJS Insurance Fraud team delivers a Virtual Mock Trial to DAC Beachcrofts Birmingham Office, in relation to fraudulent EL/PL claims

8th June, 2021
9 St John Street's Insurance Fraud team have today delivered a Virtual Mock Trial to DAC Beachcrofts Birmingham Office, in relation to fraudulent EL/PL claims.