1st December, 2008

Porter

Court of Appeal decision on the risk to be proved in a prosecution under Section 3 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

The Court of Appeal set aside the conviction of the headmaster of a private school in North Wales. He had been charged under Section 3 following the death of a young pupil who, whilst unsupervised at play time, had fallen on a set of external steps and sustained a bad injury which resulted in his death. The headmaster was convicted following a trial in the Crown Court.

The Court of Appeal decided that the risk which must be proved in such a Prosecution is a risk to health and safety which was real rather than hypothetical or fanciful. In the particular circumstances of this case, the Judge should have decided, at the conclusion of all the evidence (and not at the end of the Prosecution case) that the situation had not been such as to give rise to a risk of the type that Section 3 prohibits. The conviction was quashed. The Prosecution was refused permission to appeal to the House of Lords.
Tim Horlock QC appeared on behalf of the Prosecution/Respondent but had not appeared in the Crown Court trial.

(This case was considered by the House of Lords in R v Chargot and Others.)



Latest News...

Employment status in the EAT: One man-two guvnors? Is a taxi-driver ever self-employed?

30th March, 2023
Louise acted pro bono via Advocate for a taxi owner who had been found to be the employer of the driver who rented his taxi in the EAT before HHJ Auerbach.

Inheritance Act Claims Webinar - Broken promises and testamentary freedom

30th March, 2023
David Gilchrist, Richard Selwyn Sharpe and Charles Holbech will discuss topical issues under the Inheritance Act and in relation to claims of proprietary estoppel which affect wills, estates and the administration of estates.

Martin Mensah and Amy Smith participate in Mock Employment Tribunal for Squire Patton Boggs

22nd March, 2023
They were able to bring their specialist experience to the training session, helping managers and Employee Relations identify best practice when dealing with disciplinary hearings.