30th January, 2020

High Court Claim an abuse of process

Following an investigation into alleged misconduct on the part of Abbot Cuthbert Madden OSB (C) (which allegations were not maintained) a negative decision was made concerning his return to office as Abbot of Ampleforth. The decision was made by Abbot Christopher Jamison OSB (D1) with input from a Safeguarding Commission (D2) and an independent Review Panel. The advice given to D1 was obtained as part of the National Safeguarding arrangements for the investigation and resolution of safeguarding concerns within the Catholic Church in England and Wales.

C issued proceedings in the High Court challenging D1's decision and claiming declaratory relief and specific performance (including reinstatement to office). The claim was also directed against a number of additional defendants; including the Catholic Trust of England & Wales (D4). C alleged D4 was primarily or vicariously liable for the decision made and/or the process which led to it.

Each of the defendants applied for summary judgment and/or strike out on the grounds that the claims lacked any reasonable prospect of success. On behalf of D4, it was also submitted that the proceedings were an "abuse of process".

Following a two-day hearing before the Senior Master, the claims were struck out and summary judgment granted. The claim against D4 was struck out on the grounds that it lacked any reasonable prospect of success and constituted an abuse of process. The claimant was ordered to pay the Defendants' costs.

Ed Morgan appeared on behalf of D4.



Latest News...

The judgment of the Supreme Court in TUI v Griffiths regarding 'uncontroverted' expert evidence: nuclear bomb or damp squib?

29th November, 2023
William Hamilton and Beth Caunce review this Supreme Court decision which concerns the correct approach to "uncontroverted" expert evidence, here in the context of a travel sickness claim, but with broader ramifications regarding the procedural fairness of refraining from cross-examining an expert or relying on one’s own expert and waiting instead to criticise that expert’s opinion in closing submissions.

"Don't discuss the case with anyone until your evidence has finished" (we really mean it!)

28th November, 2023
Rachael Levene and Louise Quigley successfully got a multi-day claim of race discrimination struck out after the Claimant failed to heed the warning of not discussing the case until her evidence was complete.

Pupillage Gateway, open to view adverts

27th November, 2023
Today we launch our adverts for pupillage in the Criminal, Family, Employment and Personal Injury teams.