News

22nd January, 2020

Jamie Hill successful in CPR 44.15 case

Jamie acted for the MIB in S & others v S & MIB, obtaining a strike out of all 3 claims and an enforceable costs orders as a result.

The 3 claimants alleged they had been injured when hit from behind in an RTA.  Details were exchanged at the scene. The address was false, the house number on the street given did not exist. The name was suspected to be false too, that also incapable of being traced.

Claims were initially brought under the Untraced Drivers Agreement 2003 and rejected. The Claimants then issued proceedings under the Uninsured Drivers Agreement 2015, using the details provided at the scene as those of the First Defendant.

Having heard Jamie's submissions the Judge struck out the claims pursuant to CPR 3.4 (2) (a) and (b).  It was held there were no reasonable grounds for bringing the claims as the Claimants had previously accepted the First Defendant was untraced, and in any event he could not be served at a non-existent address. The Judge also found the current claims to be an abuse of the Court’s process.

The Judge accepted that it followed that CPR 44.15 applied. The Court had no discretion and accordingly the costs of £9,000 were directly enforceable against the Claimants.

Jamie's profile, containing further details of his recent work, can be found here.



Latest News...

We are seeking applicants for a Civil Diary Manager

20th June, 2022
Chambers has a vacancy for a Civil Diary Manager. The successful candidate will be joining a team of 3 clerks looking after the interests of the Personal Injury and Insurance Fraud Teams.

We're recruiting...

10th June, 2022
9SJS Employment Team is the number 1 ranked leading set for Employment Law in the Northwest and is nationally recognised for the skill and expertise of its practitioners. The ongoing success of the team is reflected in the quality of instructions and diversity of our client base.

Nigel Grundy successfully defends 66 allegations of disability related harassment on behalf of an NHS Trust

1st June, 2022
The case concerned 66 serious allegations of disability related harassment involving a number of NHS staff spread over 3 years.