News

21st March, 2019

Michael O’Neill secures finding of fundamental dishonesty and an enforceable costs order pursuant to CPR 44.16

The Claimant pursued a claim for personal injury arising out of a road traffic accident in April 2014. Her medical report referred to immediate severe pain for 6 weeks, followed by ongoing moderate pain at 16.5 months post accident.

The Defendant disclosed a call recording, taken on the day of the accident, in which her husband had indicated that he and the Claimant were both fine. The Claimant’s medical records showed that she had never reported the accident, or her alleged injuries, to her GP, despite regularly attending during the prognosis period.

The Claimant discontinued prior to trial and the Defendant subsequently applied for a finding of fundamental dishonesty. The District Judge was satisfied the claim was fundamental dishonesty and ordered the Claimant to pay costs in excess of £8,000.

Michael O'Neill's Chambers profile can be viewed HERE.



Latest News...

Nigel Booth takes up position at the University of Law in Manchester

7th August, 2020
On 1st September 2020 Nigel Booth will be taking up a position at the University of Law in Manchester tutoring criminal litigation, evidence and sentencing on the Bar Vocational Course.

Divisional Court ruling in relation to the Article 2 Inquest re: Dawn Sturgess

31st July, 2020
Divisional Court addresses the issue of the ruling of the Senior Coroner for Wiltshire and Swindon on the scope of the Article 2 inquest conducted into the death of Dawn Sturgess.

Vanessa Thomson summarises the case of R v Jason Lawrance

29th July, 2020
Vanessa Thomson has summarised the case of R. v. Jason Lawrance where the Court of Appeal gave consideration to the question of deception and the vitiation of consent. Does a lie by a defendant, that he is infertile, negate ostensible consent given by a complainant?