7th July, 2023

Unreasonable Conduct and Strike Out of Claims

Vashistha v Heath Education England and Ors

The Claimant was a trainee post-graduate doctor, removed from training following an ARCP outcome 4 and dismissal by the Lead Employer Trust followed. He issued proceedings against Health Education England, St Helens & Knowsley NHS Trust (as Lead Employer) and a cohort of GPs who had participated in his training.

Following detailed preliminary hearings, the matter was listed for final hearing (32 days). Two months before the hearing date, the Claimant applied to vacate in order to support a close family member through treatment in India. The application was refused, and the case remained listed. The Claimant pursued an expedited appeal to the EAT.

Before the appeal could be heard, and shortly before the scheduled start date, the Claimant once more applied for the case to be postponed. He then left for India. He had not instructed Counsel or Solicitor to attend the hearing.

Given the Claimant's absence, the Judge removed the case from the list. Unaware of this development, the EAT listed the appeal. HH Judge Barklam dismissed the appeal. Thereafter, the Respondents applied for the claims to be struck out on the grounds of the Claimant’s conduct in the proceedings. Following a further preliminary hearing, Judge Quill dismissed all claims.

Ed Morgan KC appeared for HEE and St Helen's & Knowsley NHS Foundation Trust (instructed by Hill Dickinson).

The full judgment may be accessed here.



Latest News...

Christopher Kennedy KC appointed as a Deputy High Court Judge

26th February, 2024
Chambers are delighted to announce our Head of Chambers Christopher Kennedy KC has been appointed as a Deputy High Court Judge by the Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales.

Costs in the Employment Tribunal... a warning...

21st February, 2024
It's rare for the Tribunal to make a costs order against a Claimant and even rarer when that Claimant is unrepresented. However, if your claim is wholly without merit and you treat the Tribunal, the witnesses and the lawyers with contempt, then the Tribunal can and will exercise its powers to make an order for costs under rules 75 and 76 of the 2013 Regulations.

Louise Quigley successfully defends NHS Trust in Menopause discrimination claim

12th February, 2024
Louise successfully represented a NHS Trust in defeating a complex menopause sex and disability discrimination claim.